Home › Guide › Blockchain incorporation
Founding a Company in the Blockchain and Crypto Sector
Founding a business in blockchain, crypto trading, mining, NFT platforms or DeFi usually requires notarisation of the articles of association in Germany – and a business purpose that will stand up before the commercial register.
Last updated: 11 July 2026 · Prof. Dr. Frank Martin, notary in Limburg an der Lahn, Germany
Legal forms requiring notarisation
- GmbH (sec. 2 (1) GmbHG) – articles of association must be notarised; minimum share capital EUR 25,000.
- UG (haftungsbeschränkt) – notarisation also with the model protocol (sec. 2 (1a) GmbHG); incorporation from EUR 1.
- AG (sec. 23 (1) AktG) – notarisation of the statutes.
Since August 2022, GmbH and UG incorporations can also be carried out by notarial online procedure (sec. 16a BeurkG, sec. 2 (3) GmbHG) – participants join by video via the Federal Chamber of Notaries' platform. A significant simplification for founder teams in different locations or abroad.
The business purpose: precision pays off
Commercial register courts examine whether the business purpose is sufficiently specific and not evidently subject to licensing. Wordings such as "trading in crypto assets", "operating blockchain infrastructure", "mining and staking" or "developing decentralised applications" need careful drafting: they must describe the model accurately without inadvertently covering licensable activities. As notary, I ensure a register-proof wording and certify the register filings.
Regulatory classification
Certain business models are supervised: crypto custody has been a licensable financial service in Germany since 2020 (sec. 1 (1a) sent. 2 no. 6 KWG); since the end of 2024, the European MiCAR regulation adds its own authorisation regime for crypto-asset services. The regulatory classification shapes both the articles and the register filing. The supervisory analysis itself is not part of the notarial function – I recommend consulting specialised counsel on financial regulation.
Contributing crypto assets in kind
Contributing Bitcoin or other crypto assets as a contribution in kind to a GmbH is possible in principle (sec. 5 (4) GmbHG) but demands care: the articles must specify object and amount, a formation report is required, and value must be demonstrated to the register court. Overvaluation triggers liability for the difference (sec. 9 GmbHG). Volatility between valuation and registration is a real structuring issue – a cash incorporation followed by acquisition of the crypto assets is often the simpler route. For the UG, contributions in kind are excluded (sec. 5a (2) sent. 2 GmbHG).
After incorporation
Later measures also require notarisation or certification: capital increases, amendments of articles, share transfers (sec. 15 (3) GmbHG – including tokenised business models), changes of managing directors and reorganisations. Continuous notarial support keeps the structure consistent.
Crypto as business assets: a different tax regime
Where crypto assets are held in a GmbH, the private holding period of sec. 23 EStG does not apply: gains are subject to corporation and trade tax, distributions additionally to taxation at shareholder level. Whether holding via a corporation is advantageous depends on the investment horizon, reinvestment intention and personal situation and must be reviewed for tax purposes – particularly against the backdrop of the planned reorganisation of private crypto taxation from 2027. The corporate implementation (formation, articles, contribution in kind) is carried out notarially. More: The end of the holding period from 2027.
Tokenisation and share transfer
For business models that "tokenise" participations or assets, a careful distinction must be drawn between the technical token level and the legal level. The transfer of GmbH shares requires notarisation regardless of any tokenisation (sec. 15 (3) GmbHG); a token cannot replace the share without form. Anyone planning such models should align the corporate structure with the technical implementation early to avoid later problems of form.
Shareholders' agreements and vesting
Particularly with crypto and blockchain start-ups, provisions on share vesting, leaver clauses, consent reservations and the treatment of the company's crypto assets are advisable. Such shareholders' agreements complement the articles and create clarity among founders. Elements requiring notarisation – such as share-transfer obligations – I integrate into the notarial structure with legal certainty.
FAQ on this topic
Yes – GmbH and UG incorporations have been possible via notarial online procedure since August 2022 (sec. 16a BeurkG), by video through the Federal Chamber of Notaries' platform with qualified electronic signature. Register filings can be certified online as well.
In principle yes, as a contribution in kind to a GmbH (sec. 5 (4) GmbHG) – with a formation report and proof of value; overvaluation triggers difference liability (sec. 9 GmbHG). For the UG, contributions in kind are not permitted. A cash incorporation is often more practical.
That depends on the model: crypto custody is licensable (sec. 1 (1a) sent. 2 no. 6 KWG) and many crypto-asset services fall under MiCAR. This supervisory analysis belongs with specialised counsel; the business purpose is then aligned with the outcome.
Whether it is sufficiently specific and does not evidently indicate a licensable activity without authorisation. Vague wordings ("digital services of all kinds") or unintentionally broad ones ("banking business with crypto assets") lead to interim orders and delay.
As business assets the private holding period does not apply; instead there is taxation with corporation and trade tax, and distributions are taxed additionally. Whether it is worthwhile depends on the investment horizon and personal situation and must be reviewed for tax purposes – especially in view of the planned reform of private crypto taxation from 2027. The formation itself I implement notarially.
No, not without form. The transfer of GmbH shares requires notarisation (sec. 15 (3) GmbHG). A token cannot replace this form. Tokenisation models must therefore cleanly separate the legal transfer level from the technical one.
Related articles
Real estate and Bitcoin
The sec. 16a GwG prohibition in Germany, routes for foreign property and crypto-consideration contracts.
Safeguarding private keys
Notarial custody, safe deposit box, Shamir scheme, multisig – finding the right concept.
Current case law
Verified decisions on crypto assets – from taxability to enforcement.
Would you like to discuss your matter?
Briefly describe the notarial act you have in mind – I will get back to you promptly with an assessment and a proposed appointment.